Search for: "John Doe (CD)"
Results 1 - 20
of 407
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2007, 9:28 am
In a California "John Doe" case, BMG v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 5:50 pm
Does 1-5, the case pending in the Western District of Michigan targeting students at Northern Michigan University, pro se litigant John Doe #5 has moved for reconsideration of the Magistrate Judge's order denying his motion to vacate and to quash.Defendant John Doe #5's Motion for Reconsideration*-->* Document published online at Internet Law & Regulation-->Commentary & discussion:[]-->-->… [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 1:41 pm
Does 1-14 (Phoenix, AZ) was turned over one day after John Doe #3 had filed a motion to quash the subpoena, and on the same day that John Doe #8 joined in John Doe #3's motion.We have no idea how this happened, but it would seem that (a) the University of Arizona should not have responded to the subpoena when a motion to quash the subpoena had been filed, and (b) the motions to quash aren't going to be of much use to… [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 7:17 am
In the Boston University "John Doe" case, Arista v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 11:56 am
Does 1-10, John Doe #4 has made a motion to dismiss the Linares declaration, dismiss the complaint, and quash the subpoena. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 6:02 pm
As it usually does once it obtains its response to the subpoena in its John Doe cases, the RIAA has voluntarily dismissed without prejudice its Portland, Oregon, case targeting students at the University of Oregon, Arista Records v. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 6:13 am
P. 20, dismissed as to all John Does except John Doe #1, and ordered the RIAA to file separate new cases against each of the dismissed John Does within 20 days.The judge did not, however, question the sufficiency of the complaint, or the plaintiffs' showing of a need for ex parte discovery. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 3:22 pm
You may recall a "John Doe" case against 38 different "John Does", LaFace v. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 11:33 am
Does 1-11, the case which targets Oklahoma State University students, "John Does" have made a motion to strike the RIAA's papers, and dismiss the complaint, based upon the RIAA's "contemptuous behavior" in disregard of the Court's rules and a Court order. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 6:28 pm
Does 1-9, the Columbus, Ohio, case in which the Magistrate Judge had dismissed and severed as to John Does 2-9 due to their misjoinder, but granted the RIAA's motion for discovery, the District Judge sustained the rulings of the Magistrate, over objections from both sides, in a July 29, 2008, decision.Now the RIAA has filed a Notice of Dismissal Without Prejudice.July 29, 2008, Decision affirming Magistrate Judge's rulingsNotice of Dismissal Without… [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 6:24 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia in Doe v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 2:10 am
The Court clarified that that does not make s 17 a strict liability offence. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 5:26 am
Does 1-38.The student has until October 17th to file a motion to vacate.He is being represented by attorney Steve Robertson, of Robertson, Medlin & Blocker, and is looking for other NC State "John Does" to join him and share expenses.This is the 5th motion of which we are aware by college student "John Does" to vacate the ex parte order. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 5:48 pm
Does 1-4, the "John Doe" case which the RIAA commenced after submitting a notice of dismissal of Warner v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:21 am
Once again the RIAA has commenced a "John Doe" case targeting North Carolina State University students, this one entitled Arista v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 5:16 am
" In McMann, supra at 263, Judge Tauro did just that when confronted with an inadequate factual and legal showing at the beginning of a John Doe proceeding. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 3:45 am
In a new "John Doe" case against 22 students at Rhode Island College in Providence, Rhode Island, Arista v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 4:56 am
April 3, 2008), targeting students at Carnegie-Mellon University, a student (John Doe #3), appearing pro se, lost her motion to quash the subpoena, but won her motion for severance. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 5:26 pm
Does 1-11, the District Court has granted the defendant John Doe #9's motion for severance, and severed as to Doe #9 and all other defendants except John Doe #1.District Judge Kathleen O'Malley rejected the RIAA's argument that severance was premature, agreed with the authorities that had granted severance, and dismissed the authorities cited by the RIAA as providing insufficient analysis, explanation, or rationale.November 3,… [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 6:37 am
In view of the fact that many universities, and probably many ISP's, will soon be facing "John Doe" cases in which the RIAA improperly joins unrelated "John Doe" defendants, we thought this an appropriate juncture to remind lawyers of the Order in federal court in Austin, Texas, in Fonovisa v. [read post]
